Optimistic Bias in Time and Cost Estimation for Solar Power Plant Project

Bagus Wahyu Utomo


Industrial environment has seen from the ability of company to meet the high requirements and expectations from consumers on quality, cost, and processing time. Experienced estimators on project tend to underestimate or pesimistic bias when assessing when project will be completed or how much it will cost for the project. Purpose of this study is to identify whether optimistic biases influence project estimation and submit proposal intervention. This study use a solar power plant project as a case study. Respondents in this study were employees of an EPC company that was categorized as a novice and expert. Optimistic bias occur on the accuracy of time and the cost of the respondent. In general, the accuracy of expert respondents in estimating project time and costs is more accurate than respondent novice. Intervention in this study is when estimating project time and costs should be carried out by expert category estimator.


Project, Optimistic Bias, Estimation, Solar Power Plant


Xenidis, Y & Stavrakas, E. (2012). Risk based Budgeting of Infrastructure Projects. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 74, 478-487.

Cerpa, N., Bardeen, M., Astudillo, C. A., & Verner, J. (2016). Evaluating Different Families of Prediction Methods for Estimating Software Project Outcomes. The Journal of System and Software, 112, 48-64.

Aziz, R. F ., & Hafez, S. M. (2013). Applying Lean Thinking in Construction and Performance Improvement. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 52(4), 679-695.

Sigmund, Z., & Radujkovic, M. (2014). Risk Breakdown Structure for Construction Projects on Existing Buildings. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 894-901.

Ahmed, M. M., Bello, A. A., & Idris, M. N. (2012). Natural Gas Utilization and The Nigerian Gas-To-Liquid Project: An Opportunity to End Gas Flaring. International Journal of Emerging trends in Engineering and Development, 2(2).

Sharot, T. (2011). The Optimism Bias. Current Biology, 21(23), 941-945.

Sunardi., & Aji, W. S. (2017). Mikrohidro untuk Solusi Daerah Terpencil. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Kedirgantaraan, 3, 143-147.

Shahnazari, M. R., & Lari, H. R. (2017). Modeling of a solar power plant in Iran. Energy Strategy Reviews, 18, 24-37.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2018). Indikator Ekonomi Agustus 2018. Jakarta. Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia.

Project Management Institute. (2013). Aguide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Newtown Square, Pennsylfania, USA. Project Management Institute.

Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2011). Project Management: The Managerial Process. New York. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Orr, A. D. (2004). Advanced Project Management. London, United Kingdom. Kogan Page.

Montgomery, D. C., & Runger, G. C. (2014). Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, 6th ed. United States of America. John Wiley & Sons.

Blank, L. T. (1980). Statistical Procedures for Engineering, Management, and Science. Tokyo. McGraw-Hill.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.28989/senatik.v4i0.223

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 13 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Conference SENATIK P-ISSN :2337-3881 and  E-ISSN : 2528-1666