A Comparative Study of Problem Solving Methods in Decision Support Systems

Obert Obert, Muhammad Fadlan

Abstract


Decision Support System (DSS) as one of the disciplines related to decision making both by individuals and companies in general, has been widely applied in various fields such as health, education, energy and business. There are several choices of methods related to decision support systems that have been used globally. The selection of suppliers as one of the important agendas in a company requires a decision support system so that the selected supplier is the best according to the criteria set by the company. In this study several DSS methods are used to solve supplier selection problems. In addition, this study conducted a comparison of the three methods in the DSS, namely WSM, SAW and WP in the case of supplier selection. The main contribution of this article is to compare some DSS methods that have not been studied before. As a result, there are two of the three methods that have the same sequence of results, namely the SAW and WP methods. Where in both methods the A2 alternative has the highest value of 0.875 for SAW and 0.84 for WP results. While very different results are obtained using WSM calculations.

Keywords


DSS, WSM, WP, SAW, supplier

References


Alanazi, H. O., Abdullah, A. H., & Larbani, M. (2013). Dynamic weighted sum multi-criteria decision making: Mathematical Model. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention, 1(2), 16-18.

Wang, Y. J. (2015). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model based on simple additive weighting method and relative preference relation. Applied Soft Computing, 30, 412-420.

Kurniasih, D. L. (2017). Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan laptop dengan metode TOPSIS. Pelita Informatika: Informasi dan Informatika, 3(2).

Avvenuti, M., Cresci, S., Marchetti, A., Meletti, C., & Tesconi, M. (2014, August). EARS (earthquake alert and report system): a real time decision support system for earthquake crisis management. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1749-1758). ACM.

Gorsevski, P. V., Cathcart, S. C., Mirzaei, G., Jamali, M. M., Ye, X., & Gomezdelcampo, E. (2013). A group-based spatial decision support system for wind farm site selection in Northwest Ohio. Energy Policy, 55, 374-385.

Kusumaningrum, A. (2013, December). Penerapan Simple Additive Weighting And Location Quotient Untuk Menentukan Lokasi Penyebaran Ternak (Studi Kasus: Kabupaten Brebes). In Conference SENATIK STT Adisutjipto Yogyakarta (Vol. 1, p. 108).

Samuel, O. W., Asogbon, G. M., Sangaiah, A. K., Fang, P., & Li, G. (2017). An integrated decision support system based on ANN and Fuzzy_AHP for heart failure risk prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 68, 163-172.

Fadlan, M., & Muhammad, M. (2017). Terapan Kombinasi Metode Topsis Dan Analytical Hierarchy Process Pada Perekomendasian Penerima Beasiswa Peningkatan Prestasi Akademik (Studi Kasus pada STMIK PPKIA Tarakanita Rahmawati). Simetris: Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Elektro dan Ilmu Komputer, 8(2), 663-670.

M. Fadlan and D. Kurniawan, “Rekayasa Aplikasi Pemilihan Anggota Peserta Lomba Cerdas Cermat Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” in PROSIDING SNIT SEMINAR NASIONAL INOVASI & TREN, 2014, pp. A213–A216.

Handoko, D., Mesran, M., Nasution, S. D., Yuhandri, Y., & Nurdiyanto, H. (2017). Application Of Weight Sum Model (WSM) In Determining Special Allocation Funds Recipients. The IJICS (International Journal of Informatics and Computer Science), 1(2).

Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56-66.

Alanazi, H. O., Abdullah, A. H., & Larbani, M. (2013). Dynamic weighted sum multi-criteria decision making: Mathematical Model. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention, 1(2), 16-18.

Deng, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., & Mahadevan, S. (2014). Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(1), 156-167.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.28989/senatik.v4i0.142

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 32 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Conference SENATIK P-ISSN :2337-3881 and  E-ISSN : 2528-1666